Prevalence of Peripheral Polyneuropathy Before and After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.

PURPOSE: Peripheral polyneuropathy (PPN) can occur in diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, and after bariatric surgery (BS). We decided to evaluate PPN prevalence before (PreBS-PPN) and after BS (PostBS-PPN) and to look for variables that may be independently associated with both. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated 1467 participants with obesity and without DM before and 10.4 ± 6.8 months after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire were used to define the presence of PPN and the Metabolic Equivalent Task (MET) spent per week, respectively. Using Poisson regression models with a robust estimator, the prevalence of PreBS-PPN and PostBS-PPN was analyzed as dependent variables. RESULTS: Prevalence of PostBS-PPN (10.5%) was lower than PreBS-PPN (20.4%, p < 0.001), with a prevalence of 12.7% post-RYGB and 8.4% post-SG (p = 0.072). In the univariate analysis, PreBS-PPN was associated with post-menopausal status (PMS), older age, and taller height. In twelve regression models, we found an independent association of PreBS-PPN with older age, PMS, and taller height. PostBS-PPN prevalence was associated with a higher fasting glycemia and stature, and a lower MET on univariate analysis, and with higher fasting glycemia, stature and RYGB in four multivariate regression models. CONCLUSION: PPN occurs frequently in subjects with obesity without DM and is lower after BS. SG is not likely to be harmful in the development of neuropathy. Studies of PPN incidence and persistence after BS should clarify these factors.

Effect of Bariatric Surgery on High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol in Non-diabetic Patients with Severe Obesity.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated changes in serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) induced by laparoscopic bariatric surgery (BS) in non-diabetic obese subjects with low (L-HDL-C) or normal (N-HDL-C) levels of HDL-C. We assessed whether increased HDL-C is associated with weight loss, serum non-HDL cholesterol (non-HDL-C), serum triglycerides (TG), and physical activity (PA) before and 6 and 15 months after BS. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 71 subjects undergoing BS (42 by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 29 by sleeve gastrectomy) were evaluated for the % Excess Weight Loss (%EWL), waist circumference (WC), serum levels of glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, TG, HDL-C, non-HDL-C, and LDL-C, and the degree, time, and energy expenditure related to PA. The short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to assess PA. RESULTS: Levels of HDL-C significantly increased 15 months after BS (p < 0.001) in subjects with low (p < 0.001) or normal (p = 0.017) values at baseline. A similar %EWL, decrease in WC, glucose, non-HDL-C, and LDL-C levels and increase in energy expenditure related to PA, was observed in both groups (L-HDL-C and N-HDL-C) at 15 months after BS. However, the L-HDL-C group presented greater decrease in TG levels compared with N-HDL-C group (p = 0.004). In subjects with increased HDL-C 15 months after BS, there was an association between this increase and the %EWL (p = 0.030), but there was no association with the change in PA. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of PA after BS, subjects with low and normal HDL-C levels at baseline showed an increase in HDL-C after BS, and this increase was associated with %EWL induced by BS.

Polyneuropathy in Severely Obese Women Without Diabetes: Prevalence and Associated Factors.

BACKGROUND: Obesity and its complications are prevalent in women and increase with age. Polyneuropathy (PNP) is a complication of obesity and bariatric surgery (BS). In subjects with severe (grades II and III) obesity and without DM who are candidates for BS, the prevalence of PNP and associated conditions are not well characterized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of PNP in severely obese (SO) women without DM or common nutritional deficiencies in order to determine factors associated with the presence of PNP. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed on 450 SO women. They were evaluated with the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, a Sleep Apnea Questionnaire, and the short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. Data on blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, serum glucose, glycated hemoglobin, LDL and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, vitamin B12, and postmenopausal (PM) status were also collected. Patients with DM and other common causes of PNP were excluded. To evaluate which variables were independently associated with PNP (dependent variable), Poisson regression models were used. RESULTS: The prevalence of PNP was 11.6%. In univariate analysis, PNP was associated with age, PM status, and diagnosis of systemic arterial hypertension (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.016, respectively), and there was a trend toward an association with sleep apnea risk (p = 0.101). In multivariate analysis, PM status (PR = 2.836, 95% CI 1.735-4.636, p = 0.001) and age (PR = 1.0511, 95% CI 1.031-1.071, p = 0.001) were independently associated with PNP diagnosis in two different models. CONCLUSION: Even prior to BS, PNP is highly prevalent and is associated with PM status and age in SO women without diabetes.

Peripheral polyneuropathy in severely obese patients with metabolic syndrome but without diabetes: Association with low HDL-cholesterol.

INTRODUCTION:: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of peripheral polyneuropathy (PPN) in subjects with grade II and III obesity (Ob-II,III) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) but without diabetes and to investigate possible associated factors. METHOD:: A cross-sectional study was performed in non-diabetic Ob-II,III,MetS patients using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) to assess the presence of PPN. RESULTS:: A total of 24 of 218 non-diabetic Ob-II,III,MetS patients had PPN. Based on univariate analysis, serum levels of LDL-cholesterol (p=0.046) were significantly associated with PPN, while serum triglycerides (p=0.118) and low HDL-cholesterol (p=0.057) showed a tendency toward this association. On a Poisson regression analysis, when the three possible associations were included, low HDL-cholesterol (p=0.047) remained independently associated. CONCLUSION:: In non-diabetic Ob-II,III,MetS patients, PPN defined by the MNSI showed a high prevalence and was associated with low levels of HDL-cholesterol. In order to diagnose that complication, neurological evaluation should be performed in these patients.

Peripheral polyneuropathy in severely obese patients with metabolic syndrome but without diabetes: Association with low HDL-cholesterol / Polineuropatia periférica em pacientes obesos graves com síndrome metabólica sem diabetes: associação com baixo HDL-colesterol

Summary Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of peripheral polyneuropathy (PPN) in subjects with grade II and III obesity (Ob-II,III) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) but without diabetes and to investigate possible associated factors. Method: A cross-sectional study was performed in non-diabetic Ob-II,III,MetS patients using the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) to assess the presence of PPN. Results: A total of 24 of 218 non-diabetic Ob-II,III,MetS patients had PPN. Based on univariate analysis, serum levels of LDL-cholesterol (p=0.046) were significantly associated with PPN, while serum triglycerides (p=0.118) and low HDL-cholesterol (p=0.057) showed a tendency toward this association. On a Poisson regression analysis, when the three possible associations were included, low HDL-cholesterol (p=0.047) remained independently associated. Conclusion: In non-diabetic Ob-II,III,MetS patients, PPN defined by the MNSI showed a high prevalence and was associated with low levels of HDL-cholesterol. In order to diagnose that complication, neurological evaluation should be performed in these patients.

Resumo Objetivo: Avaliar a prevalência da polineuropatia periférica (PNP) em indivíduos obesos graus II e III com síndrome metabólica (Ob-II,III,SM) sem diabetes e buscar possíveis fatores associados. Método: Em um estudo transversal, realizado em indivíduos Ob-II,III,SM e sem diagnóstico de diabetes, o Instrumento de Screening de Michigan (MNSI) foi utilizado para avaliar a presença de PNP. Resultados: Um total de 24 de 218 pacientes Ob-II,III,SM e sem diabetes tinham PNP. Quando observamos as associações com PNP em uma análise univariada, níveis séricos de LDL-colesterol (p=0.046) estiveram significativamente associados e houve também uma tendência à associação com níveis séricos de triglicerídeos (p=0.118) e baixo HDL-colesterol (p=0.057). Em uma análise de regressão de Poisson, quando as três possíveis associações foram incluídas, baixo HDL-colesterol (p=0.047) manteve-se independentemente associado. Conclusão: Em pacientes Ob-II,III,SM, mas sem diabetes, a PNP definida pelo MNSI tem uma prevalência elevada e está associada a baixos níveis de HDL-colesterol. Para diagnóstico dessa complicação, recomenda-se realizar o exame neurológico desses pacientes.

Evaluation of Metabolic Syndrome in morbidly Obese Patients Submitted to Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: Comparison of the Results between Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Morbid obesity is a state of insulin resistance combined with excess of visceral fat, which contributes to the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS). Nonsurgical treatment of obesity usually improves MetS, but there is no ultimate resolution and weight regain is common. Surgical options like Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) result in a significant and sustained weight loss accompanied by improvement of MetS. The aim of this study was to compare the weight loss and improvement of MetS parameters between degree II and III obese patients with MetS undergoing RYGB or SG in a period of 12 months. METHODS: Analysis of medical records of 102 patients diagnosed with MetS (63 undergoing RYGB and 39 undergoing SG) in a reference center (CTO ISCMPA) between 2010 and 2013. RESULTS: After 1-year follow-up, an excess weight loss (EWL) of 77.2 ± 22.5% and of 63.4 ± 20.1% (p = 0.033) was observed in the RYGB and SG groups, respectively. The rate of MetS resolution was very similar (87.3 and 84.6%, respectively; p = 0.971). The percentage of patients with type 2 diabetes was 3.3% for RYGB and 15.4% for SG (p = 0.025). Fasting blood glucose levels followed the same trend with mean values reaching 87.6 ± 16.9 mg/dl in the RYGB group and 97.7 ± 35.5 mg/dl in the group undergoing SG (p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients studied, both surgical techniques were safe and effective for MetS resolution in 12 months. However, RYGB was more effective for EWL and improvement of some parameters related to glucose metabolism.

Baseline characteristics and risk factors for ulcer, amputation and severe neuropathy in diabetic foot at risk: the BRAZUPA study.

BACKGROUND: Studies on diabetic foot and its complications involving a significant and representative sample of patients in South American countries are scarce. The main objective of this study was to acquire clinical and epidemiological data on a large cohort of diabetic patients from 19 centers from Brazil and focus on factors that could be associated with the risk of ulcer and amputation. METHODS: This study presents cross sectional, baseline results of the BRAZUPA Study. A total of 1455 patients were included. Parameters recorded included age, gender, ethnicity, diabetes and comorbidity-related records, previous ulcer or amputation, clinical symptomatic score, foot classification and microvascular complications. RESULTS: Patients with ulcer had longer disease duration (17.2 ± 9.9 vs. 13.2 ± 9.4 years; p < 0.001), and poorer glycemic control (HbA1c 9.23 ± 2.03 vs. 8.35 ± 1.99; p < 0.001). Independent risk factors for ulcer were male gender (OR 1.71; 95 % CI 1.2-3.7), smoking (OR 1.78; 95 % CI 1.09-2.89), neuroischemic foot (OR 20.34; 95 % CI 9.31-44.38), region of origin (higher risk for those from developed regions, OR 2.39; 95 % CI 1.47-3.87), presence of retinopathy (OR 1.68; 95 % CI 1.08-2.62) and absence of vibratory sensation (OR 7.95; 95 % CI 4.65-13.59). Risk factors for amputation were male gender (OR 2.12; 95 % CI 1.2-3.73), type 2 diabetes (OR 3.33; 95 % CI 1.01-11.1), foot at risk classification (higher risk for ischemic foot, OR 19.63; 95 % CI 3.43-112.5), hypertension (lower risk, OR 0.3; 95 % CI 0.14-0.63), region of origin (South/Southeast, OR 2.2; 95 % CI 1.1-4.42), previous history of ulcer (OR 9.66; 95 % CI 4.67-19.98) and altered vibratory sensation (OR 3.46; 95 % CI 1.64-7.33). There was no association between either outcome and ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Ulcer and amputation rates were high. Age at presentation was low and patients with ulcer presented a higher prevalence of neuropathy compared to ischemic foot at risk. Ischemic disease was more associated with amputations. Ethnical differences were not of great importance in a miscegenated population.

Metabolic syndrome resolution by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a real world: a case control study.

OBJECTIVES: the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), compared with nonsurgical treatment (NS group), as an instrument for inducing remission of co-morbidities related to Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) in patients with Obesity, grades 2 and 3 (Ob2,3). METHODS: two hundred and fifty eight Ob2,3 patients were selected in a retrospective analysis and included in a case control study. MetS was defined as described by the International Diabetes Federation. One hundred and twenty-nine of these patients underwent RYGB (S group), and 129 were assessed as an NS group. RESULTS: at baseline, S and NS groups did not differ in BMI, age, female sex and prevalence of MetS (p>0.05). For the S group the outcomes were a reduction in BMI of 38.1% (p<0.001), waist circumference of 28.6% (p<0.001), fasting plasma glucose of 10.5% (p<0.001), serum LDL-cholesterol of 21.9% (p<0.001) and of 85% in the number of patients with MetS (p<0.001). For the NS group, only a decrease of 4.12%(p=0.047) in triglyceride levels and of 5.9%(p=0.031) in Diastolic Blood Pressure was observed. In the NS group, 98.6% of the patients continued to have MetS. The number needed to treat (NNT) with surgery to resolve one case of MetS was 1.2 (CI 95%: 1.1 - 1.4). CONCLUSION: in the real world, in the South of Brazil, compared with NS treatment and after 1 year of observation, RYGB is highly effective for decreasing the prevalence of MetS.

Metabolic syndrome resolution by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a real world: a case control study / Resolução da síndrome metabólica pela gastroplastia Roux-em-Y em um mundo real: estudo caso-controle

Summary Objectives: the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), compared with nonsurgical treatment (NS group), as an instrument for inducing remission of co-morbidities related to Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) in patients with Obesity, grades 2 and 3 (Ob2,3). Methods: two hundred and fifty eight Ob2,3 patients were selected in a retrospective analysis and included in a case control study. MetS was defined as described by the International Diabetes Federation. One hundred and twenty-nine of these patients underwent RYGB (S group), and 129 were assessed as an NS group. Results: at baseline, S and NS groups did not differ in BMI, age, female sex and prevalence of MetS (p>0.05). For the S group the outcomes were a reduction in BMI of 38.1% (p<0.001), waist circumference of 28.6% (p<0.001), fasting plasma glucose of 10.5% (p<0.001), serum LDL-cholesterol of 21.9% (p<0.001) and of 85% in the number of patients with MetS (p<0.001). For the NS group, only a decrease of 4.12%(p=0.047) in triglyceride levels and of 5.9%(p=0.031) in Diastolic Blood Pressure was observed. In the NS group, 98.6% of the patients continued to have MetS. The number needed to treat (NNT) with surgery to resolve one case of MetS was 1.2 (CI 95%: 1.1 - 1.4). Conclusion: in the real world, in the South of Brazil, compared with NS treatment and after 1 year of observation, RYGB is highly effective for decreasing the prevalence of MetS. .

Resumo Objetivo: o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia do bypass gástrico em Y de Roux (BGYR), em comparação a um tratamento não cirúrgico (grupo NC), como instrumento para induzir remissão da síndrome metabólica (SMet) em pacientes com obesidade graus 2 e 3 (Ob2, 3). Métodos: duzentos e cinquenta e oito pacientes com Ob2,3 foram selecionados para análise retrospectiva em estudos de caso e controle. SMet foi definida como descrita pela Federação Internacional de Diabetes. Dos pacientes, 129 foram submetidos ao BGYR (grupo C), e 129 formaram o grupo NC. Resultados: antes dos tratamentos, os grupos C e NC não diferiram em IMC, idade, sexo feminino e prevalência de SMet (p>0,05). No grupo C, houve uma redução no IMC de 38,1% (p<0,001), circunferência da cintura de 28,6% (p<0,001), glicemia de jejum de 10,5% (p<0,001), LDL colesterol sérico de 21,9% (p<0,001) e em 85% dos casos de SMet (p<0,001). As diferenças observadas no grupo NC foram uma diminuição nos níveis de triglicérides, de 4,12% (p=0,047), e na pressão arterial diastólica, de 5,9% (p=0,031). No grupo NC, 98,6% dos pacientes persistiram com SMet. O número necessário para tratar (NNT) com a cirurgia, para resolver um caso de SMet, foi de 1,2 (IC 95%: 1,1 - 1,4). Conclusão: em um mundo real, no Sul do Brasil, em comparação ao tratamento NS e após 1 ano de observação, BGYR foi altamente eficaz para diminuir a prevalência de SMet. .

[Latin American consensus on hypertension in patients with diabetes type 2 and metabolic syndrome]. / Consenso latino-americano de hipertensão em pacientes com diabetes tipo 2 e síndrome metabólica.

The present document has been prepared by a group of experts, members of cardiology, endocrinology, internal medicine, nephrology and diabetes societies of Latin American countries, to serve as a guide to physicians taking care of patients with diabetes, hypertension and comorbidities or complications of both conditions. Although the concept of metabolic syndrome is currently disputed, the higher prevalence in Latin America of that cluster of metabolic alterations has suggested that metabolic syndrome is a useful nosography entity in the context of Latin American medicine. Therefore, in the present document, particular attention is paid to this syndrome in order to alert physicians on a particular high-risk population, usually underestimated and undertreated. These recommendations result from presentations and debates by discussion panels during a 2-day conference held in Bucaramanga, in October 2012, and all the participants have approved the final conclusions. The authors acknowledge that the publication and diffusion of guidelines do not suffice to achieve the recommended changes in diagnostic or therapeutic strategies, and plan suitable interventions overcoming knowledge, attitude and behavioural barriers, preventing both physicians and patients from effectively adhering to guideline recommendations.

Consenso latinoamericano de hipertensión en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 y síndrome metabólico / Latin american consensus on hypertension in patients with diabetes type 2 and metabolic syndrome

El presente documento ha sido preparado por un grupo de expertos, miembros de las sociedades de Cardiología, Endocrinología, Medicina Interna, Nefrología y Diabetes de los países de América Latina, para que sirva de guía a los médicos que cuidan a pacientes con diabetes, hipertensión y enfermedades concomitantes o complicaciones de ambas condiciones. Aunque el concepto de síndrome metabólico actualmente es discutido, la alta prevalencia en América Latina del conjunto de alteraciones metabólicas que lo conforman sugiere que el síndrome metabólico es una entidad nosográfica útil en el contexto de la medicina latinoamericana. Por lo tanto, en el presente documento se presta especial atención a este síndrome con el fin de alertar a los médicos de una particular población de alto riesgo que por lo general es subestimada y en la que no se tratan en forma óptima los factores de riego que constituyen el síndrome metabólico. Las presentes recomendaciones son el resultado de las presentaciones y los debates en los paneles de discusión durante una reunión de 2 días celebrada en Bucaramanga en octubre de 2012. Todos los participantes han aprobado las conclusiones finales. Los autores reconocen que la publicación y la difusión de las guías no serán suficientes para alcanzar los cambios recomendados tanto en las estrategias diagnósticas como terapéuticas, por lo que se han programado intervenciones que permitan identificar las barreras del conocimiento, de las actitudes y del comportamiento, lo que permitirá tanto a los médicos como a los pacientes una adecuada adherencia a las recomendaciones de las guías

The present document has been prepared by a group of experts, members of Cardiology, Endocrinology, Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Diabetes societies of Latin American countries, to serve as a guide to physicians taking care of patients with diabetes, hypertension and comorbidities or complications of both conditions. Although the concept of metabolic syndrome is currently disputed, the higher prevalence in Latin America of that cluster of metabolic alterations has suggested that metabolic syndrome is useful nosography entity in the context of Latin American medicine. Therefore, in the present document, particular attention is paid to this syndrome in order to alert physicians on a particular high- risk population, usually underestimated and undertreated. These recommendations results from presentation and debates by discussion panels during a 2-day conference held in Bucaramanga, in October 2012, and all the participants have approved the final conclusions. The authors acknowledge that the publication and diffusion of guidelines do not suffice to achieve the recommended changes in diagnostic or therapeutic strategies, and plan suitable interventions overcoming both physicians and patients from effectively adhering to guideline recommendations

Consenso latino-americano de hipertensão em pacientes com diabetes tipo 2 e síndrome metabólica / Latin American consensus on hypertension in patients with diabetes type 2 and metabolic syndrome

O presente documento foi preparado por um grupo de especialistas, membros das Sociedades de Cardiologia, Endocrinologia, Medicina Interna, Nefrologia e Diabetes dos países da América Latina, para que sirva de diretriz para médicos que cuidam de pacientes com diabetes, hipertensão e fatores de risco concomitantes ou complicações de ambas as condições. Embora o conceito de síndrome metabólica seja atualmente muito discutido, a alta prevalência na América Latina do conjunto de alterações metabólicas que a compõem sugere que a síndrome metabólica é uma entidade nosográfica útil no contexto da medicina latino-americana. Devido a isso, no presente documento presta-se especial atenção a essa síndrome com a finalidade de alertar aos médicos sobre uma população particularmente de alto risco, que, por ser subestimada, não é tratada de forma adequada para os fatores de risco que constituem a síndrome metabólica. As recomendações deste documento são o resultado de apresentações e debates que ocorreram durante um encontro de dois dias em Bucaramanga (Colômbia), em outubro de 2012. Todos os participantes aprovaram as decisões finais. Os autores reconhecem que a publicação e difusão das diretrizes não serão suficientes para alcançar as mudanças recomendadas tanto em estratégias diagnósticas como terapêuticas, por isso programaram intervenções que permitirão identificar as barreiras do conhecimento, as atitudes e comportamento, o que permitirá tanto aos médicos como aos pacientes uma adequada adesão às recomendações sugeridas nestas diretrizes. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2014;58(3):205-25.

The present document has been prepared by a group of experts, members of cardiology, endocrinology, internal medicine, nephrology and diabetes societies of Latin American countries, to serve as a guide to physicians taking care of patients with diabetes, hypertension and comorbidities or complications of both conditions. Although the concept of metabolic syndrome is currently disputed, the higher prevalence in Latin America of that cluster of metabolic alterations has suggested that metabolic syndrome is a useful nosography entity in the context of Latin American medicine. Therefore, in the present document, particular attention is paid to this syndrome in order to alert physicians on a particular high-risk population, usually underestimated and undertreated. These recommendations result from presentations and debates by discussion panels during a 2-day conference held in Bucaramanga, in October 2012, and all the participants have approved the final conclusions. The authors acknowledge that the publication and diffusion of guidelines do not suffice to achieve the recommended changes in diagnostic or therapeutic strategies, and plan suitable interventions overcoming knowledge, attitude and behavioural barriers, preventing both physicians and patients from effectively adhering to guideline recommendations. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metab. 2014;58(3):205-25.

[Latin American consensus on hypertension in patients with diabetes type 2 and metabolic syndrome]. / Consenso latinoamericano de hipertensión en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 y síndrome metabólico.

The present document has been prepared by a group of experts, members of Cardiology, Endocrinology, Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Diabetes societies of Latin American countries, to serve as a guide to physicians taking care of patients with diabetes, hypertension and comorbidities or complications of both conditions. Although the concept of metabolic syndrome is currently disputed, the higher prevalence in Latin America of that cluster of metabolic alterations has suggested that metabolic syndrome is useful nosography entity in the context of Latin American medicine. Therefore, in the present document, particular attention is paid to this syndrome in order to alert physicians on a particular high- risk population, usually underestimated and undertreated. These recommendations results from presentation and debates by discussion panels during a 2-day conference held in Bucaramanga, in October 2012, and all the participants have approved the final conclusions. The authors acknowledge that the publication and diffusion of guidelines do not suffice to achieve the recommended changes in diagnostic or therapeutic strategies, and plan suitable interventions overcoming both physicians and patients from effectively adhering to guideline recommendations.

Consenso latinoamericano de hipertensión en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 y síndrome metabólico / Latin american consensus of hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome

Resumen El presente documento ha sido preparado por un grupo de expertos, miembros de las sociedades de cardiología, endocrinología, medicina interna, nefrología y diabetes de los países de América Latina, para que sirvan de guía a los médicos que cuidan a pacientes con diabetes, hipertensión y enfermedades concomitantes o complicaciones de ambas condiciones. Aunque el concepto de síndrome metabólico actualmente es discutido, la alta prevalencia en América Latina del conjunto de alteraciones metabólicas que lo conforman sugiere que el síndrome metabólico es una entidad nosográfica común en el contexto de la medicina latinoamericana. Por lo tanto, en el presente documento se presta especial atención a este síndrome con el fin de alertar a los médicos de una particular población de alto riesgo, en la que por lo general es subestimada y no se tratan en forma optima los factores de riego que constituyen el síndrome metabólico. Las presentes recomendaciones son el resultado de las presentaciones y los debates en los paneles de discusión durante una reunión de dos días celebrada en Bucaramanga en octubre de 2012. Todos los participantes han aprobado las conclusiones finales. Los autores reconocen que la publicación y difusión de las guías no serán suficientes para alcanzar los cambios recomendados tanto en las estrategias diagnósticas como terapéuticas, por lo que se ha programado intervenciones que permitan identificar las barreras del conocimiento, de las actitudes y de comportamiento, lo que permitirá tanto a los médicos como a los pacientes una adecuada adherencia a las recomendaciones de las guías. (Acta MedColomb 2013; 38: 154-172).

Abstract The present document has been prepared by a group of experts, members of cardiology, endocrinology, internal medicine, nephrology and diabetes societies of Latin American Countries, to serve as a guide to physicians taking care of patients with diabetes, hypertension and comorbidities or complications of both conditions. Although the concept of metabolic syndrome is currently disputed, the higher prevalence in Latin America of that cluster of metabolic alterations has suggested that metabolic syndrome is useful nosography entity in the context of Latin American medicine. Therefore, in the present document, particular attention is paid to this syndrome in order to alert physicians on a particular high- risk population, usually underestimated and undertreated. These recommendations results from presentation and debates by discussion panels during a 2-day conference held in Bucaramanga, in October 2012, and all the participants have approved the final conclusions. The authors acknowledge that the publication and diffusion of guidelines do not suffice to achieve the recommended changes in diagnostic or therapeutic strategies, and plan suitable interventions overcoming both physicians and patients from effectively adhering to guideline recommendations. (Acta Med Colomb 2013; 38: 154-172)).

Consenso latinoamericano de hipertensión en pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 y síndrome metabólico / Latin american consensus on hypertension in patients with diabetes type 2 and metabolic syndrome

El presente documento ha sido preparado por un grupo de expertos, miembros de las sociedades de cardiología, endocrinología, medicina interna, nefrología y diabetes de los países de América Latina, para que sirvan de guía a los médicos que cuidan a pacientes con diabetes, hipertensión y enfermedades concomitantes o complicaciones de ambas condiciones. Aunque el concepto de síndrome metabólico actualmente es discutido, la alta prevalencia en América Latina del conjunto de alteraciones metabólicas que lo conforman sugiere que el síndrome metabólico es una entidad nosografías útil en el contexto de la medicina latinoamericana. Por lo tanto, en el presente documento se presta especial atención a este síndrome con el fin de alertar a los médicos de una particular población de alto riesgo, en la que por lo general se subestimada y no se trata en forma óptima los factores de riego que constituyen el síndrome metabólico. Las presentes recomendaciones son el resultado de las presentaciones y los debates en los paneles de discusión durante una reunión de 2 días celebrada en Bucaramanga en octubre de 2012. Todos los participantes han aprobado las conclusiones finales. Los autores reconocen que la publicación y difusión de las guías no serán suficientes para alcanzar los cambios recomendados tanto en las estrategias diagnósticas como terapéuticas, por lo que se ha programado intervenciones que permitan identificar las barreras del conocimiento, de las actitudes y de comportamiento, lo que permitirá tanto a los médicos como a los pacientes una adecuada adherencia a las recomendaciones de las guías(AU)

The present document has been prepared by a group of experts, members of cardiology, endocrinology, internal medicine, nephrology and diabetes societies of Latin American Countries, to serve as a guide to physicians taking care of patients with diabetes, hypertension and comorbidities or complications of both conditions. Although the concept of metabolic syndrome is currently disputed, the higher prevalence in Latin America of that cluster of metabolic alterations has suggested that metabolic syndrome is useful nosography entity in the context of Latin American medicine. Therefore, in the present document, particular attention is paid to this syndrome in order to alert physicians on a particular high- risk population, usually underestimated and undertreated. These recommendations results from presentation and debates by discussion panels during a 2-day conference held in Bucaramanga, in October 2012, and all the participants have approved the final conclusions. The authors acknowledge that the publication and diffusion of guidelines do not suffice to achieve the recommended changes in diagnostic or therapeutic strategies, and plan suitable interventions overcoming both physicians and patients from effectively adhering to guideline recommendations(AU)

Consenso latinommericano de hipertensión en pacentes con diabetes tipo 2 y sínndrome metabólico / Latin american consensus on hypertension in patients with type 2diabetes and meetabolic syndrome / Consenso latinoamericano de hipertensão em pacientes com diabetes tipo 2 e síndrome metabólico

El presente documento ha sido preparado por un grupo de expertos, miembros de las sociedades de cardiología, endocrinología, medicina interna, nefrología y diabetes de los países de América Latina, para que sirva de guía a los médicos que cuidan a pacientes con diabetes, hipertensión y enfermedades concomitantes o complicaciones de ambas condiciones. Aunque el concepto de síndrome metabólico actualmente es discutido, la alta prevalencia en América Latina del conjunto de alteraciones metabólicas que lo conforman sugiere que el síndrome metabólico es una entidad nosografías útil en el contexto de la medicina latinoamericana. Por lo tanto, en el presente documento se presta especial atención a este síndrome con el fin de alertar a los médicos de una particular población de alto riesgo, en la que por lo general se subestimada y no se trata en forma optima los factores de riego que constituyen el síndrome metabólico. Las presentes recomendaciones son el resultado de las presentaciones y los debates en los paneles de discusión durante una reunión de 2 días celebrada en Bucaramanga en octubre de 2012. Todos los participantes han aprobado las conclusiones finales. Los autores reconocen que la publicación y difusión de las guías no serán suficientes para alcanzar los cambios recomendados, tanto en las estrategias diagnósticas como terapéuticas, por lo que se ha programado intervenciones que permitan identificar las barreras del conocimiento, de las actitudes y de comportamiento, lo que permitirá tanto a los médicos como a los pacientes una adecuada adherencia a las recomendaciones de las guías.

The present document has been prepared by a group of experts, members of cardiology, endocrinology, internal medicine, nephrology and diabetes societies of Latin American Countries, to serve as a guide to physicians taking care of patients with diabetes, hypertension and comorbidities or complications of both conditions. Although the concept of metabolic syndrome is currently disputed, the higher prevalence in Latin America of that cluster of metabolic alterations has suggested that metabolic syndrome is useful nosography entity in the context of Latin American medicine. Therefore, in the present document, particular attention is paid to this syndrome in order to alert physicians on a particular high- risk population, usually underestimated and undertreated. These recommendations results from presentation and debates by discussion panels during a 2-day conference held in Bucaramanga, in October 2012, and all the participants have approved the final conclusions. The authors acknowledge that the publication and diffusion of guidelines do not suffice to achieve the recommended changes in diagnostic or therapeutic strategies, and plan suitable interventions overcoming both physicians and patients from effectively adhering to guideline recommendations.

O presente documento tem sido preparado por um grupo de expertos, membros das sociedades de cardiologia, endocrinologia, medicina interna, nefrologiae diabetes dospaíses da América Latina, para que sirva de guia aos médicos que tomam conta de pacientes com diabetes, hipertensãoe enfermidades concomitantes ou complicaçõesdas duas condições. Porémoconceito de síndrome metabólico atualmente é discutido, a alta prevalênciana América Latina do conjunto de alterações metabólicas que o conformam,sugereque o síndrome metabólico é uma entidade nosográfica útil no contexto da medicina latino americana. Pelo tanto, no presente documento se presta especial atenção a este síndrome comofim de alertar aos médicos de una particular população de alto risco,a qual pelo geralé subestimada e não se trata em forma ótimaosfatores de risco que constituemo síndrome metabólico. As presentes recomendações sãoo resultado das apresentaçõeseos debates nos painéis de discussão durante una reunião de 2 dias celebrada em Bucaramanga em outubro de 2012. Todosos participantes têm aprovado as conclusões finais. Os autores reconhecem que a publicaçãoe difusão dos guias no serão suficientes para alcançar os câmbios recomendados tanto nas estratégiasdiagnósticas quanto terapêuticas, pelo que se têm programadointervenções que permitam identificar as barreiras do conhecimento, das atitudes e de comportamento, o que permitirá tanto aos médicos quanto aos pacientes una adequada aderênciaàs recomendações dos guias.

Latin American consensus on hypertension in patients with diabetes type 2 and metabolic syndrome.

The present document has been prepared by a group of experts, members of cardiology, endocrinology and diabetes societies of Latin American countries, to serve as a guide to physicians taking care of patients with diabetes, hypertension and comorbidities or complications of both conditions. Although the concept of 'metabolic syndrome' is currently disputed, the higher prevalence in Latin America of that cluster of metabolic alterations has suggested that 'metabolic syndrome' is a useful nosographic entity in the context of Latin American medicine. Therefore, in the present document, particular attention is paid to this syndrome in order to alert physicians on a particularly high-risk population, usually underestimated and undertreated. These recommendations result from presentations and debates by discussion panels during a 2-day conference held in Bucaramanga, in October 2012, and all the participants have approved the final conclusions. The authors acknowledge that the publication and diffusion of guidelines do not suffice to achieve the recommended changes in diagnostic or therapeutic strategies, and plan suitable interventions overcoming knowledge, attitude and behavioural barriers, preventing both physicians and patients from effectively adhering to guideline recommendations.

Evaluation of hormonal suppression with two contraceptive regimens using ethinyl estradiol and desogestrel.

PURPOSE: Because of the lack of data on hormone levels in the hormone-free interval of the contraceptive regimens with desogestrel and ethynil estradiol, the objective of this study was to compare hormonal levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol, and inhibin B using two contraceptive regimens with those steroids. METHODS: Prospective and randomized study with 21 patients. Eleven patients received a 21/7 regimen (group 1) and ten patients received a 21/2 placebo/5 ethinyl estradiol 10 µg regimen (group 2). RESULTS: We found a significant increase in FSH and LH levels in both groups. There was a significant reduction of inhibin B in the 21/2/5 regimen. No difference in estradiol levels was found. CONCLUSIONS: Steroids withdrawal in the hormone-free interval causes reduced inhibition of the HPO axis. The significant decrease in inhibin B levels of group 2 suggests better suppression of the HPO axis in the 21/2/5 regimen.

Two weeks of a low-iodine diet are equivalent to 3 weeks for lowering urinary iodine and increasing thyroid radioactive iodine uptake.

BACKGROUND: The importance of restricting iodine intake to increase thyroid uptake of ¹³¹I is well-known, but its minimum duration is not clear. The present study aimed at determining whether 3 weeks is superior to 2 weeks for a low-iodine diet (LID) as a means of increasing the thyroid uptake of ¹³¹I and reducing urinary iodine. A second goal was to evaluate the effectiveness of a questionnaire about ingestion and exposure to iodine to predict individuals in whom the LID would be less effective. METHODS: Forty-six outpatients who came to the Nuclear Medicine Unit of Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Brazil, for thyroid evaluation, were randomized to receive an LID for 2 or 3 weeks. Questionnaires regarding their exposure to iodine, the thyroid uptake of ¹³¹I, and the iodine and iodine/creatinine ratio in urine samples were administered or obtained at the beginning and end of the diet. RESULTS: The questionnaire indicated exposure to exogenous iodine in five patients during their LID, all in the 3-week group. Their thyroid ¹³¹I uptake was significantly lower than patients who did not give a history of iodine exposure (p = 0.016). The comparative analysis between the 2-week and 3-week diet groups was then performed excluding the five contaminated patients. The ¹³¹I uptake increased by 43% in the 2-week group and 26.7% in the 3-week group (p = 0.105). Both diets for 2 and 3 weeks caused significant decrease in urinary iodine (p < 0.001), without a difference between the groups (63.2% in the 2-week group and 60.9% in the 3-week group, p = 0.955). There was no difference in the percentage of patients with urinary iodine ≤100 µg/L (p = 0.25) and urinary iodine ≤50 µg/L (p = 0.86) between the groups. A correlation between urinary iodine and iodine/creatinine ratio (r = 0.516; p < 0.001) was observed. CONCLUSION: Two weeks of an LID are probably sufficient to augment thyroid uptake of ¹³¹I, with little or no benefit from longer periods of an LID. Questionnaires regarding exposure to iodine similar to those employed here should identify individuals in whom the LID has not been as effective in increasing the thyroid uptake of ¹³¹I.

Periodontal disease and risk for neuropathic foot ulceration in type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: Diabetic neuropathy (DN) has been associated with oral dryness, tooth loss and an increased risk for foot ulceration, but the association between periodontal problems and DN has not been fully elucidated. This study investigated whether the risk for neuropathic foot ulceration (DM-NFUR) was associated with periodontal disease (PD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined 122 patients with type 2 diabetes for PD; findings were compared with results for presence of DM-NFUR. PD severity was classified as none/mild (NM-PD), moderate/severe (MS-PD) and edentulous (E). RESULTS: NM-PD was found in 40.2% patients; MS-PD, in 32.0%; and 27.8% were edentulous. DM-NFUR was detected in 18.4% of the patients in the NM-PD group, in 68.2% in the MS-PD group, and in 61.8% of completely edentulous individuals. PD was significantly correlated with DM-NFUR (p